On my February 4th entry, I commented on an article about genetically modifying bulls to create an endless supply of semen from “superior” sires. This same article also specifically reasoned that heat tolerant bulls could be modified to make them more fertile. Basically, young, healthy bulls would be sterilized then spermatogonial stem cells, from highly fertile bulls, would be transplanted in them. I ended my entry by asking if cattlemen were even asking for this service.

I don’t run in the same circles as laboratory cattlemen, so I don’t have an answer to my question. I did, however, read an article in a cattlemen’s publication that was quite the opposite stance. It seems that a Texas rancher has a breeding objective of “maintaining a breed herd…of appropriate genetics for the region”. He utilizes bulls that are “smaller in frame size and had EPDs for low birth weight and maintenance energy”. This rancher also says that “selection is applied to promote high fertility and survival in a low input system”.

This I can side with. I would rather invest my dollars and time in stock that can make the grade on their own, not in cattle that have to be modified to be productive. What are your thoughts? Comment at redangus@sheribryan.com.

Durning pregnancy checks last week, Dr. V. commented on the good body condition of the girls. He knows our stock is exclusively grass-fed, and his next comment was about the longevity of grass-fed operations compared to the longevity and profitability of high input grain-fed operations. Dr. V.’s compliment on the cattle was appreciated, however the unspoken encouragement was appreciated even more.

Oftentimes, Don and I find ourselves in the minority. Have you ever been there? You start talking cattle with some folks and they ask about your farm. “We practice rotational grazing and have grass-fed breeding stock”, you answer. At that point, you get the look. The one that says, “Oh, you’re one of them.” Some even follow up by saying, “That’s a lot of work.” That’s why Dr. V.’s casual comment was encouraging. He sees what we are doing and thinks we have a good thing going. He didn’t say that producers feeding grain to their cattle is bad, just more costly than our approach.

To gather with like-minded people and talk about raising cattle on grass or reading an industry-related publication dedicated to the grass farmer is business is usual. However, hearing positive words from a person, related to the industry but with no care other than the health of your animals, is encouragement that we’re doing the thing.

“Are you looking for a bull?” My mind thought “no” as my voice said, “Tell me about him.” I was killing some time at a purebred association’s sanctioned auction and ranchers were standing by to answer questions about their consignments. “How much does he weigh”, I asked. The response was between 1800 and 2000 pounds, however the rancher didn’t know for sure because the bull was too big for the scales. Don and I have owned a 2000 pound bull and this big boy before me, with a neck the size of an oak tree, had to exceed that. To the bull’s credit though, I was told that he was “as docile as can be”. That I did believe.

Across the alley and one pen down was another bull, much younger, though I didn’t note the exact age. I did note that the sign attached to the pen said “no creep”. As tall and skinny as he was, he could have used a snack. I wondered to myself if the seller thought this young bull could be raised on grass alone or if he was selling with the anticipation that the bull would receive supplementation.

Speaking of frames, large and tall was the theme for the cows being offered. I stand about 5 feet 7 inches and some of those girls’ hip heights were at my shoulder. That would be a frame score of around 8. Many of these cows were filled out with calves by side. How were they maintaining their body scores? Grain. The ranchers were freely talking about the grain being fed on their farms. At what cost I wondered. No doubt several of them raised their own grain but there is still cost associated with that.

Don and I started out with large-framed cows. Their EPDs looked good and we felt comfortable with the seller. We soon found out though that large frames and low input, grass fed operations aren’t very profitable. On grass alone, the cows would not always breed back timely and on two occasions, needed birthing assistance. We are working toward cattle with smaller frame sizes with no regrets. Our bulls aren’t too big and heavy for heifers. The cows breed back, with a calf by side, and have good body condition.

Feeding grain might be profitable for others; I don’t see their ledger pages. I do know that feeding grain costs money whether harvesting or purchasing. As far as cow size goes, I’m not interested in spending time monitoring cows for birthing assistance. Large dams and sires produce large progeny. As a side note, at least one animal was pooping “money”. I cleaned my boots before climbing into my vehicle and saw that whole corn kernels were stuck to the bottom along with the manure.